Dan Rather - Mind Science

Quit wasting time on the web, and watch something useful for a change.

"Usually you see, we consider every emotion as just part of our life, part of our mind. For example, fear or hatred, as it comes, we just consider normal. I think that's a mistake." -- H.H. the Dalai Lama

"We are exposed to all kinds of influences in our environment all the time. Those influences are affecting our brain, they are changing our brain. If we are better able to regulate those inputs and to engage in specific kinds of training to cultivate positive qualities of mind, we can, I think, based on modern neuroscience evidence, we can change our brains by transforming our minds in beneficial ways.
...
We shouldn't think of these as fixed characteristics of people. If we take the initiative, take responsibility for our own minds, we can produce more positive individuals who have more of these beneficial qualities, which in turn, I think, will have a synergistic effect in making our culture and our society a more positive one." -- Richard Davidson, neuroscience professor; collaborator and close friend of the Dalai Lama

Math

A couple of nights ago, wracked by insomnia at 1 AM, I decided to give in to an impulse to try out a bit of math. Nothing too abstract, as I've found that my reasoning skills per se haven't improved, but something that required me to dot my "i"s and cross my "t"s. For those not of a mathematical bent, the details can be skipped entirely. Long story short: I was able to manipulate equations correctly in my head that normally are a bit tedious even on paper.

For those who want details (nerds!), here's the problem statement and (the essentials of) the solution, all done mentally:

Given the following line segments expressed in parametric form, tell whether they intersect.

(a + bt, c + dt), 0 <= t <= 1
(e + fs, g + hs), 0 <= s <= 1

So I set about solving for the value of s at which the two (infinite) lines would intersect.

a + bt = e + fs, c + dt = g + hs

t = (e + fs - a) / b = (g + hs - c) / d

b(g + hs - c) = d(e + fs - a)

bhs - dfs = d(e-a) - b(g-c)

s = [d(e - a) - b(g - c)] / (bh - df)

Voila!

A taste of freedom

You decide you’re going to watch the breath for 20 minutes. You crack your knuckles, sit cross-legged, and put a blissed-out look on your face. Today is the day you’re going to meditate, dammit!

Thirty seconds later you’re wondering what’s for dinner. Wait a minute! What just happened? You’re not schizophrenic, are you?

Well, I hate to break it to you, but in the Buddhist view of the world, yeah, you are. We all are. Deep down we want to be compassionate, saintly souls, but man! did you see that jerk just cut me off?! I want to clean my room but ooh I wonder if there’s anything new on the Internet! It’s so natural to intend one thing but do another that we figure c’est la vie, que sera sera, jeena isi ka naam hai, it’s one of the cute little perks of being human. Tee hee!

But what if there’s another way? What if by slow, unrelenting perseverance you could marshal the forces of will, waging a silent, invisible coup against the cold, neurological machinery of habit that would keep you not just away from the helm, but blissfully oblivious of and inured to your very impotence?

Contemplatives claim that a taste of free will is blissful and liberating, that mindfulness is incompatible with boredom, fear, and anxiety. Bit by bit, I am becoming more inclined to believe them.

The sound of music

This should be of interest to anyone remotely interested in music theory. At first I wasn’t going to post it, but I have to get it out of my mind. I’m going to leave out some details to keep it unrelated to my practice.

If you’ve ever studied music (modern music in the West anyway), you might have asked yourself why the most common scale – the C major diatonic scale – has such a strange setup. A4 (the A above middle C) is at 440 Hz, and the frequencies of most pairs of adjacent notes (whole steps) are separated by a multiplicative factor of the sixth root of two, except for two (half steps E-F and B-C) which are only separated by the twelfth root of two.

Seems pretty arbitrary, doesn’t it? Probably sounds so good because we’re just used to it.

But what if some ancient cultures (e.g., the Hindus) claimed to hear seven distinct notes while meditating, starting with our middle C, with the only difference being that the A was 432 Hz, instead of 440 (a recent change, it turns out)?

And what if meditators even today sometimes stumbled upon those original frequencies, "hearing" them quite distinctly, persistently, and unmistakably? Well that would be pretty neat, now wouldn’t it?

edit: a little searching reveals it was first 'invented' by the Greeks (see 'Lydian mode'), but I have my suspicions that it was known even earlier...

The snot thickens

Just as my allergies are getting so ridiculously bad that I'm considering leaving, I've also run into some strange (if minor) experiences that are unmistakable signs in an esoteric Hindu tradition.

I guess you take the good with the bad. Or maybe the bad with the bad. I don't know yet.

5/4 - A minor milestone

Yesterday was my first 8 hour day, and today I'm going to push past that.

It seems that many people in the Project (see previous post) had pretty traumatic psychological issues crop up during the first month. I'm not sure what to make of the fact that I feel completely normal. Best guess: I'm taking it too easy. If the next stage won't come to me, well then hell, I'll go to it.

If I've gained any mental control at all, I'll tell you one thing it hasn't done: relieved my fear of spiders one damn bit. There's one that resides in my room, and every now and then sees fit to rappel down to a random spot, often near my bed. How's that for a distraction?

Why shamatha?

This blog should save me some time!

It's about the Shamatha Project, which I am modeling my own retreat directly after.

Particularly interesting is the section "What are the benefits of the practice?"